Thursday, October 29, 2015
Wednesday, October 21, 2015
Model T
http://www.mtfca.com/discus/messages/118802/119926.html
Above is a great thread with lots of photos and serial numbers etc.....
http://mtfci2002.readyhosting.com/manuals/Model_T_Service_Manual/mtsm.html
"I have 2 drawings of the front axle. One is dated 12/26/1916 while the other is dated in November of 1919.
The 1916 version says spindles are 51-15/16" apart with tolerance of +/- 1/8" while the perch holes are 36-1/2" with tolerance of +/- 1/8"
The 1919 version says spindles are 51-25/32" apart with tolerance of +/- 1/8" while the perch holes are 36-11/32" with tolerance of +/- 1/8"
I have no idea if it was different on the earlier axle or the later versions either."
http://www.mtfca.com/discus/messages/29/19908.html
This post discusses the differences in the Murray Fahnstock drawing and actual measurements taken by one of the posters.....
"6. I did a spot check of the touring body drawing on page 150 of Fahnestock's "The Model T FordOwner" which Tom posted above. I compared the drawing against what I believe is a mostly original 1918 Beaudett touring (USA produced). Only one measurement was the same -- the passenger front door opening was exactly 17 inches as his drawing indicated. The other 3 or 4 places I could easily check were all slightly larger than his dimensions with the exception of the distance between the body irons on the side which were 1/8 inch LESS distance than his drawing.
That may be caused just from the differences in the bodies (he even has 1/4 inch difference shown on his touring body at the rear width between the different bodies (i.e. that 25 7/16 or 25 9/16 measurement would be multiplied by 2 for the total width of 50 14/16 or 51 2/16 inches wide at the back of the touring). The differences in my body could also be due to wear and tear over the years, sagging frame, kids playing in/on the car (hey I was one of those kids a long time ago) etc.
I could also have misread or mismeasured the car or multiplied the 1/2 numbers from centerline that he shows (never do math in public). But on my touring at the body irons the rear top bow rotates he shows it 25 5/8 inches x 2 = 50 10/8 or 51 1/4 inches. Mine measures 51 13/16 or mine was 9/16 or 3/4 inch wider than shown.
The next rear measurement across the body from rear door opening to rear door opening he shows 23 5/8 times 2 for 46 10/8 or 47 1/4. Mine is 48 wide (measured at the top -- it gets smaller as you go lower on the body) so mine is 3/4 inch wider there also.
The next width location I measured from the inside of one front side body iron to the inside of the other front body iron. He shows 25 5/8 times 2 for 50 10/8 or 51 1/4. Mine measured 51 7/8 or 5/8 inch wider (oh -- and until just now, I never really noticed that I could push in on some of those parts and make the distances smaller by about 1/16 to 1/8 inch depending on how hard you push.
My rear door opening is 3/16 inch more than he shows."
Above is a great thread with lots of photos and serial numbers etc.....
http://mtfci2002.readyhosting.com/manuals/Model_T_Service_Manual/mtsm.html
"I have 2 drawings of the front axle. One is dated 12/26/1916 while the other is dated in November of 1919.
The 1916 version says spindles are 51-15/16" apart with tolerance of +/- 1/8" while the perch holes are 36-1/2" with tolerance of +/- 1/8"
The 1919 version says spindles are 51-25/32" apart with tolerance of +/- 1/8" while the perch holes are 36-11/32" with tolerance of +/- 1/8"
I have no idea if it was different on the earlier axle or the later versions either."
http://www.mtfca.com/discus/messages/29/19908.html
This post discusses the differences in the Murray Fahnstock drawing and actual measurements taken by one of the posters.....
"6. I did a spot check of the touring body drawing on page 150 of Fahnestock's "The Model T FordOwner" which Tom posted above. I compared the drawing against what I believe is a mostly original 1918 Beaudett touring (USA produced). Only one measurement was the same -- the passenger front door opening was exactly 17 inches as his drawing indicated. The other 3 or 4 places I could easily check were all slightly larger than his dimensions with the exception of the distance between the body irons on the side which were 1/8 inch LESS distance than his drawing.
That may be caused just from the differences in the bodies (he even has 1/4 inch difference shown on his touring body at the rear width between the different bodies (i.e. that 25 7/16 or 25 9/16 measurement would be multiplied by 2 for the total width of 50 14/16 or 51 2/16 inches wide at the back of the touring). The differences in my body could also be due to wear and tear over the years, sagging frame, kids playing in/on the car (hey I was one of those kids a long time ago) etc.
I could also have misread or mismeasured the car or multiplied the 1/2 numbers from centerline that he shows (never do math in public). But on my touring at the body irons the rear top bow rotates he shows it 25 5/8 inches x 2 = 50 10/8 or 51 1/4 inches. Mine measures 51 13/16 or mine was 9/16 or 3/4 inch wider than shown.
The next rear measurement across the body from rear door opening to rear door opening he shows 23 5/8 times 2 for 46 10/8 or 47 1/4. Mine is 48 wide (measured at the top -- it gets smaller as you go lower on the body) so mine is 3/4 inch wider there also.
The next width location I measured from the inside of one front side body iron to the inside of the other front body iron. He shows 25 5/8 times 2 for 50 10/8 or 51 1/4. Mine measured 51 7/8 or 5/8 inch wider (oh -- and until just now, I never really noticed that I could push in on some of those parts and make the distances smaller by about 1/16 to 1/8 inch depending on how hard you push.
My rear door opening is 3/16 inch more than he shows."
Monday, October 19, 2015
Model T
http://www.shorpy.com/
Lots of info....
http://www.fordwood.com/which_t_do_you_have.htm
http://largescalemodelers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=20
http://www.macsautoparts.com/store/model-t-specs/
http://public.fotki.com/TheNewcityFamily/model-car-projects-/1908-to-1927-ford-m/page6.html
Bore for spindle bolt (kingpin) 5.045"-.505"
for first 5/16" of lower yoke, then 1/2" x 20 SAE threads to end
Spindle body length 4.748"-4.750" (end size)
Width of yoke (upper) .685"-.690"
Width of yoke (lower) .685"-.690"
Wheelbase was 100 inches (254 cm); while standard tread width was 56 in (142 cm),
Tires were pneumatic clincher type, 30 in (76 cm) in diameter, 3.5 in (8.9 cm) wide in the rear, 3 in (7.5 cm) wide in the front.
This link has some nice pictures and specs
http://www.modelt.ca/specifications-fs.html
Model A stuff
http://www.motormayhem.net/model-a-ford-reference-page/body-specifications/
Antique wheel manufacturer
http://www.calimerswheelshop.com/Body_Frame.html
American Vintage Rims.....nice specs and photos
http://www.americanvintagerims.com/
Lots of info....
http://www.fordwood.com/which_t_do_you_have.htm
http://largescalemodelers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=20
http://www.macsautoparts.com/store/model-t-specs/
http://public.fotki.com/TheNewcityFamily/model-car-projects-/1908-to-1927-ford-m/page6.html
Front Axle Specifications
Yoke opening for spindle body 4.748"-4.752"Bore for spindle bolt (kingpin) 5.045"-.505"
for first 5/16" of lower yoke, then 1/2" x 20 SAE threads to end
Spindle body length 4.748"-4.750" (end size)
Width of yoke (upper) .685"-.690"
Width of yoke (lower) .685"-.690"
Wheelbase was 100 inches (254 cm); while standard tread width was 56 in (142 cm),
Tires were pneumatic clincher type, 30 in (76 cm) in diameter, 3.5 in (8.9 cm) wide in the rear, 3 in (7.5 cm) wide in the front.
This link has some nice pictures and specs
http://www.modelt.ca/specifications-fs.html
Model A stuff
http://www.motormayhem.net/model-a-ford-reference-page/body-specifications/
Antique wheel manufacturer
http://www.calimerswheelshop.com/Body_Frame.html
American Vintage Rims.....nice specs and photos
http://www.americanvintagerims.com/
| 30" x 3"30" x 3.5" 28" x 3" *30" x 3.5" |
(24") (23") (22") 4 Lug. |
$135.00 $135.00 $135.00 $225.00 |
Friday, October 16, 2015
Sunday, October 11, 2015
The Victor Hugo Jackson House 240 Lenox
"This turn of the century Harlem home is a magnificent example of a
Beaux- Arts red brick and limestone mansion, built in 1899 by architect
John E. Terhune. This townhouse epitomizes Harlem living at it's best.
This 13 room corner home has over 5755 square foot of living space, 5
floors, plus a full height basement. Additionally, it has 7 fireplaces
(one wood and one gas) with original mantels, 12.5 ft ceilings, original
oak floors, a classic mansard roof, intricately carved stairway
balustrade, and tons of original details. 9 bedrooms, 5 bathrooms, a
backyard and ample living and dining areas are all features making this a
very special home."
This entire blog is just incredible.
http://daytoninmanhattan.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-victor-hugo-jackson-house-no-240.html
http://fabricated.io/projects/manhattan-stories/the-victor-hugo-jackson-house
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXE2110rdnw
John E. Terhune's No. 246 Fifth Avenue
28-30 West 123rd Street
built 1884-85
http://ww.nyc-architecture.com/HAR/HAR042.htm
This entire blog is just incredible.
http://daytoninmanhattan.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-victor-hugo-jackson-house-no-240.html
http://fabricated.io/projects/manhattan-stories/the-victor-hugo-jackson-house
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXE2110rdnw
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




